克爾凱郭爾“the leap of faith and the limits of reason”

克爾凱郭爾“the leap of faith and the limits of reason”

ID:21630563

大小:494.50 KB

頁(yè)數(shù):13頁(yè)

時(shí)間:2018-10-19

克爾凱郭爾“the leap of faith and the limits of reason”_第1頁(yè)
克爾凱郭爾“the leap of faith and the limits of reason”_第2頁(yè)
克爾凱郭爾“the leap of faith and the limits of reason”_第3頁(yè)
克爾凱郭爾“the leap of faith and the limits of reason”_第4頁(yè)
克爾凱郭爾“the leap of faith and the limits of reason”_第5頁(yè)
資源描述:

《克爾凱郭爾“the leap of faith and the limits of reason”》由會(huì)員上傳分享,免費(fèi)在線閱讀,更多相關(guān)內(nèi)容在教育資源-天天文庫(kù)。

1、Kierkegaard,“TheLeapofFaithandtheLimitsofReason”Late19thC.DanishphilosopherChristianexistentialistArguesthatitisnotpossibletoprovetheexistenceofGodthroughreason,sinceitisdifficulttoprovetheexistenceofanything.ParadoxofReasonWecannotprovetheexistenceofGod,northatGoddoesn

2、otexist,yetweareconstantlymovedtoattempttodecidetheissue.Kierkegaard’sArgumentTheonlywaythatwecanproveGod’sexistenceistobeginbypresupposingit.Butsincethisisquestion-begging,suchamethodcannotrationallydemonstrateGod’sexistence.ThustobelieveinGodoreventomaketheattempttoun

3、derstandthenatureofGodistomakealeapoffaith.ThenonecanbegintounderstandGod’spurpose.James,“TheWilltoBelieve”Thesis:logicorreasonisnotincompatiblewithfaith.SomedistinctionsAhypothesisisanassertion.eitherliveordead:liveifitisatallpossibleorcredibleforsomeone;otherwiseitisd

4、ead.Anoptionisachoicebetweentwohypotheses.livingifeitherofthepossibilitiesislive.Optionisforcedifthechoicecannotbeavoided.Optionismomentousonlyifitiscrucialthatweactononeortheotheroptions.TheReligiousHypotheses1.Thebestthingsaretheeternalthings.2.BettertobelieveinReligi

5、oneveniffalse.James’ArgumentP1.God’sexistenceisalivingoption.P2.Religionisamomentousoption.P3.Itisaforcedoption.P4.Tochoosenottobelieveinreligion(God)istothinkitisbettertofearbeingwrongmorethanhopeforthepossibilityofeternalgood.P5.Butthiscannotberight.James’Argument,con

6、t.C1.Thereforeholdingthereligioushypothesisistobepreferredtoanyalternative.P6.Religionisthekindofhypothesiswhichwecanonlyseetobetrueifweacceptitfirst.C2.Thus,itisakindoftruthwhichwecannotseeifweareskepticalofit.James’Argument,cont.P7.Anyrulethatpreventsusfrombeingableto

7、apprehendakindoftruthmustbeabadrule.C3.Sotherecannotbeacommandofreasontobeskepticalofreligion.C.Thereforethereligioushypothesisiscompatiblewithreason.FaithandRationalBeliefFaithisnotthesameasrationalbelief1.Beliefassumesthepossibilitythattheassertionisfalse.2.Beliefscou

8、ldbefalsifiedbytheempiricalevidence.Faith,unlikebelief,isunlimitedbytheempiricalfactsoftheworld.Faithislimited

當(dāng)前文檔最多預(yù)覽五頁(yè),下載文檔查看全文

此文檔下載收益歸作者所有

當(dāng)前文檔最多預(yù)覽五頁(yè),下載文檔查看全文
溫馨提示:
1. 部分包含數(shù)學(xué)公式或PPT動(dòng)畫(huà)的文件,查看預(yù)覽時(shí)可能會(huì)顯示錯(cuò)亂或異常,文件下載后無(wú)此問(wèn)題,請(qǐng)放心下載。
2. 本文檔由用戶上傳,版權(quán)歸屬用戶,天天文庫(kù)負(fù)責(zé)整理代發(fā)布。如果您對(duì)本文檔版權(quán)有爭(zhēng)議請(qǐng)及時(shí)聯(lián)系客服。
3. 下載前請(qǐng)仔細(xì)閱讀文檔內(nèi)容,確認(rèn)文檔內(nèi)容符合您的需求后進(jìn)行下載,若出現(xiàn)內(nèi)容與標(biāo)題不符可向本站投訴處理。
4. 下載文檔時(shí)可能由于網(wǎng)絡(luò)波動(dòng)等原因無(wú)法下載或下載錯(cuò)誤,付費(fèi)完成后未能成功下載的用戶請(qǐng)聯(lián)系客服處理。