資源描述：
《多目標(biāo)決策的協(xié)調(diào)分析方法研究》由會(huì)員上傳分享，免費(fèi)在線閱讀，更多相關(guān)內(nèi)容在教育資源-天天文庫(kù)。
1、吉林工業(yè)大學(xué)碩士研究生畢業(yè)論文Justlikeothersystemevaluationandanalysismethods,i.e.Tradeoffmethod,TargetCompromisemeth喊ExpectationValuemethodandEntropymetl峨ConcordanceAnalysisisoneoftheMulticriteriaEvaluationmethods.However,itismuchmorepopularinEuropewithHolandasitsstudycentreb
2、ecauseofitsnormalstepsofanalysismethod.TheobviouscharacteristicofConcordanceAnalysisisthattheadvantagesanddisadvantagesoftheschemecanbeevaluatedThePrincipleofOptimalityandthePrincipleofSatisfactionwhichisputforwardbyH.A.Simon,awell-knownAmericanmanagementscienti
3、stareoftenadoptedtodealwiththedecision-makingproblem,buteitherofthemhasitsownadvantagesanddisadvantages.However,onthebasisofCompromisePrinciple,ConcordanceAnalysistakesintoaccountcomprehensivelyoftheadvantagesanddisadvantages,i.e.degreeofsatisfactionanddissatisf
4、action,andscientificalymakesthebestevaluationoutofallschemes,whichwillprovideusefultoolsinthetheoreticalanalysisandpracticalapplicationfortheevaluationdecisionofmulti-evaluationindexandmulti-planscheme.Therefore,afurtherstudyonConcordanceAnalysisisnotonlynecessa
5、rybutalsourgentSomeresearcheswillbemadeinthefolowingaspectsinthispaper:(1)thenormaldescriptionofConcordanceAnalysisAlgorithm;(2)thecharacteristicsofConcordancepriorityindexandDisconcordancepriorityindex;(3)thesensitivityofindexvaluevariation,additionandsubtracti
6、onofscheme,andadditionandsubtractionofevaluationindexinConcordanceAnalysis;(4)themathematicalmodelanditssensitivityinvariatedweightConcordanceAnalysis;(5)thebasicClusteringAnalysismethodofConcordance.Inthispaper,theauthornotonlyimprovestheConcordanceAnalysismeth
7、odtoacertainextent,butalsoprovidestheoreticalbasisforitswideradoption.Keywords:ConcordanceAnalysis,Concordancepriorityindex,Disconcordancepriorityindex,Sensitivityanalysis,Clusteringanalysis.吉林工業(yè)大學(xué)碩士研究生畢業(yè)論文前言在多目標(biāo)決策問(wèn)題中，人們常用的決策方法一般都是基于最優(yōu)化原理和美國(guó)著名管理科學(xué)家H.A.西蒙的滿足化原理而提
8、出來(lái)的。比較典型的方法有:Trade-of方法、目標(biāo)達(dá)成法、期望值法、嫡(Entropy)方法以及層次分析法(AHP)等。綜觀這些方法都有一個(gè)缺點(diǎn)，那就是在評(píng)價(jià)方案時(shí)只是從方案的優(yōu)勢(shì)或劣勢(shì)來(lái)分析，這往往使得評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果并不一定最佳。而本文研究的協(xié)調(diào)分析方法，則由于其基于妥協(xié)原理(Co-pro而sePrinciple)，綜合考慮方案的優(yōu)
