資源描述:
《秦嶺油松人工林與次生林群落特征比較》由會員上傳分享,免費(fèi)在線閱讀,更多相關(guān)內(nèi)容在教育資源-天天文庫。
1、浙江林學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)2008.25(6):711—717JournalofZhejiangForestryCollege秦嶺油松人工林與次生林群落特征比較景麗,朱志紅,王孝安,郭華(陜西師范大學(xué)生命科學(xué)學(xué)院,陜西西安710062)摘要:采用標(biāo)準(zhǔn)樣地法對秦嶺旬陽壩地區(qū)油松Pintabulaeformis次生林與人工林進(jìn)行了群落學(xué)調(diào)查研究,旨在比較天然油松林遭砍伐后經(jīng)過自然恢復(fù)或人工栽植恢復(fù)40a左右群落的特征差異結(jié)果表明:天然恢復(fù)次生林有維管植物66科104屬134種.人.T-林有維管植物73科104屬125種.2種群落含12個(gè)種的科均較多;人工林與次生林共有種為70種.種
2、類組成相似系數(shù)為53.03%2種群落的垂直結(jié)構(gòu)相似,都分為喬木、灌木和草本3層,喬木層又分3個(gè)亞層:人工林喬木層、灌木層密度低于次生林,草本層密度高于次生林2種群落物種多樣性指數(shù)中,Shannon—Wiener指數(shù)、Margalef指數(shù)和Richness指數(shù)的大小順序均為灌木層>草本層>喬木層,Simpson指數(shù)均為喬木層>草本層>灌木層,Evenness指數(shù)的變化不一致,天然次生林為灌木層>草本層>喬木層,人工林為灌木層>喬木層>草本層;次生林喬木層的物種豐富度指數(shù)顯著高于人工林.而均勻度指數(shù)顯著低于人工林:人工林與次生林灌木層各多樣性指數(shù)無明顯差異:人工林草本層
3、的優(yōu)勢度顯著高于次生林人工林凋落物厚度顯著高于次生林,土壤營養(yǎng)指標(biāo)在2種群落間均無明顯差異上述結(jié)果說明,經(jīng)過40a左右的恢復(fù),人工林與次生林群落特征已達(dá)到一定程度的相似性,油松適合作為該地區(qū)的造林樹種恢復(fù)天然植被表9參21關(guān)鍵詞:森林生態(tài)學(xué):秦嶺:油松:人工林;天然次生林:群落特征:物種多樣性中圖分類號:$718.54:Q948.15文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)志碼:A文章編號:1000—5692(2008)06.0711—07CommunitycharacteristicsofaPinustabulaeformissecondaryforestandaplantedforestinth
4、eXunyangbaRegionoftheQinlingMountainsJINGLi,ZHUZhi—hong,WANGXiao—an,GUOHua(CollegeofLifeSciences,ShaanxiNormalUniversity,Xi’an710062,Shaanxi,China)Abstract:Basedonthesurveyanddatafrom8plots,thecommunitycharacteristicsofanaturalsee—ondaryforestofPinustabulaeformisandPtabulaeformisplanta
5、tionwerecomparedusingastandardquadratmethod,inordertoknowinfluenceofdifferentmanagementstyleonrestorationofthecommunitiesafterdisafforestabout40years.Analysesincludeduseofthesimilarity,Shannon—Wiener,Margalef,Richness,Simpson’SDominance,andEvennessIndices.Mainresultsasfollow:(1)Theseco
6、ndaryforestconsistedof134vascularspeciesbelongingto66familiesand104genera,whereastheplantedforestincluded125vas—cularspeciesin73familiesand104genera.Thefamilieswhichincludedlto2specieswereplentifulinthetwocommunities.Asimilarityindexof53.0%wasobtainedwith70CO—occurringspecies.(2)Thever
7、ticalstructureofbothcommunitiescontainedtree,shrub,andherblayers.withthetreelayersubdividedintothreelayers.Plantdensityinthetreeandshrublayersoftheplantationwaslowerthanthesecondaryforest(P<0.05),butdensityintheherblayerwashigher(P<0.05).(3)Fromtheangleofspatialpatterns,inbothseconda