資源描述:
《處分論文:論無權(quán)處分買賣合同的效力》由會(huì)員上傳分享,免費(fèi)在線閱讀,更多相關(guān)內(nèi)容在學(xué)術(shù)論文-天天文庫。
1、處分論文:論無權(quán)處分買賣合同的效力【中文摘要】司法實(shí)踐中,我們經(jīng)常會(huì)遇到因擅自出賣他人(或者共有)之物而引發(fā)的買賣合同糾紛。對(duì)于該類合同的效力作何認(rèn)定,學(xué)界爭(zhēng)議一直較大,最高人民法院的意見幾經(jīng)變遷,各地人民法院亦做出不同的認(rèn)定,這種法律適用的不安定狀態(tài)既不利于穩(wěn)定市場(chǎng)交易秩序,也對(duì)司法公信力產(chǎn)生了嚴(yán)重的負(fù)面影響。因此,對(duì)無權(quán)處分買賣合同的效力認(rèn)定作深入研究,比較分析各種效力狀態(tài)下的利弊得失,總結(jié)出司法機(jī)關(guān)當(dāng)前可采之裁判方法,明晰未來之立法趨勢(shì),具有重要的理論價(jià)值和實(shí)踐價(jià)值。本文首先從處分行為的基本概念入手,簡(jiǎn)要介紹了
2、無權(quán)處分買賣合同效力認(rèn)定的三種主要學(xué)術(shù)觀點(diǎn)、世界主要國家的立法例、最高人民法院關(guān)于無權(quán)處分買賣合同效力的認(rèn)識(shí)變遷、地方法院最新司法判例,指出將無權(quán)處分買賣合同認(rèn)定為有效合同既是世界立法趨勢(shì),也被越來越多的司法判例所采納。本文在比較和分析不同效力認(rèn)定對(duì)相關(guān)當(dāng)事人利益影響的基礎(chǔ)上,通過利益衡量論證了有效認(rèn)定的合理性。最后本文認(rèn)為,將無權(quán)處分買賣合同認(rèn)定為有效合同系立法趨勢(shì),但在新的法律頒布實(shí)施前,應(yīng)采取“無效認(rèn)定、有效處理”的方法,衡平無權(quán)處分情勢(shì)下買賣合同相關(guān)當(dāng)事人特別是善意買受人的利益?!居⑽恼縄njudicia
3、lpractice,weoftenencountercaseswhichcausedbyuntitledpersonssoldothersorcommonproperties.Howtoidentificationtheeffectofthesecontracts,therearecontroversialviewsinacademia.TheSupremePeople’scourtopinionschangeseveraltimes,districtcourtinourcountryalsomakedifferen
4、tcognizances.Theapplicablelawoftheinstabilityisnotconducivetothestabilityofthemarketeconomicorder,butalsoseriouslyaffectedthepubliccredibilityofthejudiciary.Therefore,weshouldtakein-depthresearchonthevalidityoftheunauthorizeddispositionsalescontracts,analysisth
5、eeffectivenessofvariousconditions,comparetheadvantagesanddisadvantage,summarizedthepropermethodsthatcanbetakenincurrentandfutureforthecourts.Thatwillhasimportantvalueinpracticeandtheoretical.Inthispaper,theauthoranalysisthebasicconceptofthedispositionatfirst,br
6、ieflyintroducesthreemainacademicviewsontheidentificationoftheunauthorizeddispositioninsalescontracts,thelegislationinsomemajorcountriesoftheworld,focusingontheSupremePeople’sCourtonthevalidityofcontractofunauthorizeddispositioncognitivechanges,andthelatestjudic
7、ialprecedents,Itispointedoutthatidentifiedtheunauthorizeddispositionsalescontractsasvalidcontractsistheworldtrendoflegislation,andalsohasbeenadoptedbymoreandmorejudicialprecedents.Itcanbepresumedbyinterestsmeasuredthatidentifiedtheunauthorizeddispositioncontrac
8、tstobevalidcontractswillgivefullprotectionfordifferentparties’rights,andgoodforpromotionoftransactionsafety.Finally,theauthorbelievesthatisthetendencyofthecontractlegislatio