building bridges between structural and program evaluation approaches to evaluating policy

building bridges between structural and program evaluation approaches to evaluating policy

ID:7266518

大?。?.43 MB

頁數(shù):44頁

時間:2018-02-09

building bridges between structural and program evaluation approaches to evaluating policy_第1頁
building bridges between structural and program evaluation approaches to evaluating policy_第2頁
building bridges between structural and program evaluation approaches to evaluating policy_第3頁
building bridges between structural and program evaluation approaches to evaluating policy_第4頁
building bridges between structural and program evaluation approaches to evaluating policy_第5頁
資源描述:

《building bridges between structural and program evaluation approaches to evaluating policy》由會員上傳分享,免費(fèi)在線閱讀,更多相關(guān)內(nèi)容在工程資料-天天文庫

1、JournalofEconomicLiterature48(June2010):2,356–398http:www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/jel.48.2.356BuildingBridgesBetweenStructuralandProgramEvaluationApproachestoEvaluatingPolicyJamesJ.Heckman*Thispapercomparesthestructuralapproachtoeconomicpolicyanalysiswithth

2、eprogramevaluationapproach.Itoffersathirdwaytodopolicyanalysisthatcombinesthebestfeaturesofbothapproaches.IillustratethevalueofthisalternativeapproachbymakingtheimpliciteconomicsofLATEexplicit,therebyextendingtheinterpretabilityandrangeofpolicyquestionsthatLATEcananswe

3、r.(JELC21,E61)1.?Introductionconflictsbetween“structural”and“reducedform”approaches.2Incurrentusage,“struc-Fewtopicsineconomicsevokemoretural”istakentomeanparametric,explicitlypassionthandiscussionsaboutthecor-formulated,empiricaleconomicmodels.rectwaytodoempiricalpoli

4、cyanalysis.1“Reducedform”hasmultipleandsome-Thesediscussionsaresometimesframedastimesconflictingmeanings.Onestrandofthe1Seetheessaysinthesymposium“Conoutof*?UniversityofChicago,UniversityCollegeDublin,Economics,”JournalofEconomicPerspectives,Vol.24,No.CowlesFoundation,

5、YaleUniversity,andtheAmerican2,Spring2010(JoshuaD.AngristandJorn-SteffenPischkeBarFoundation.IthankEdVytlacilfornumerousdiscus-2010;LiranEinavandJonathanD.Levin2010;Michaelsionsonthetopicsdiscussedinthispaperovertheyears.P.Keane2010;EdwardE.Leamer2010;AvivNevoandIalsot

6、hankhimforhiscommentsonthispaper.IthankMichaelD.Whinston2010;ChristopherA.Sims2010;PhilippEisenhauer,MiriamGensowski,TimKautz,JamesH.Stock2010).RodrigoPinto,SteveStern,andBenWilliamsforhelpful2JamesJ.HeckmanandEdwardJ.Vytlacil(2007a)comments.Idrawoncommentsandsuggestio

7、nsmadeondiscusstheconceptofstructureandreducedformasdefinedprecursorstothispaperbySteveDurlauf,LarsHansen,bythepioneeringCowlesCommissioneconometricianswhoRichardRobb,andJoseScheinkman,althoughnonehavedevelopedthefirstrigorousframeworkforinferenceandreadthisversion.The

8、precursorpapersareHeckmanpolicyanalysis.Thisconceptreceiveditscleareststatement(1992,1997,2000,2008).IthankPhilippEis

當(dāng)前文檔最多預(yù)覽五頁,下載文檔查看全文

此文檔下載收益歸作者所有

當(dāng)前文檔最多預(yù)覽五頁,下載文檔查看全文
溫馨提示:
1. 部分包含數(shù)學(xué)公式或PPT動畫的文件,查看預(yù)覽時可能會顯示錯亂或異常,文件下載后無此問題,請放心下載。
2. 本文檔由用戶上傳,版權(quán)歸屬用戶,天天文庫負(fù)責(zé)整理代發(fā)布。如果您對本文檔版權(quán)有爭議請及時聯(lián)系客服。
3. 下載前請仔細(xì)閱讀文檔內(nèi)容,確認(rèn)文檔內(nèi)容符合您的需求后進(jìn)行下載,若出現(xiàn)內(nèi)容與標(biāo)題不符可向本站投訴處理。
4. 下載文檔時可能由于網(wǎng)絡(luò)波動等原因無法下載或下載錯誤,付費(fèi)完成后未能成功下載的用戶請聯(lián)系客服處理。