資源描述:
《the critique of pure reason外語(yǔ)英文電子書(shū)》由會(huì)員上傳分享,免費(fèi)在線閱讀,更多相關(guān)內(nèi)容在教育資源-天天文庫(kù)。
1、TheCritiqueofPureReasonImmanuelKantWorkreproducedwithnoeditorialresponsibilityNoticebyLuarnaEdicionesThisbookisinthepublicdomainbecausethecopyrightshaveexpiredunderSpanishlaw.Luarnapresentsithereasagifttoitscus-tomers,whileclarifyingthefollowing:1)Becausethiseditionhasno
2、tbeensuper-visedbyoureditorialdeparment,wedisclaimresponsibilityforthefidelityofitscontent.2)Luarnahasonlyadaptedtheworktomakeiteasilyviewableoncommonsix-inchreaders.3)Toalleffects,thisbookmustnotbecon-sideredtohavebeenpublishedbyLuarna.www.luarna.comINTRODUCTIONI.Ofthed
3、ifferencebetweenPureandEmpiricalKnowledgeThatallourknowledgebeginswithexperiencetherecanbenodoubt.Forhowisitpossiblethatthefacultyofcognitionshouldbeawak-enedintoexerciseotherwisethanbymeansofobjectswhichaffectoursenses,andpartlyofthemselvesproducerepresentations,partlyr
4、ouseourpowersofunderstandingintoactiv-ity,tocomparetoconnect,ortoseparatethese,andsotoconverttherawmaterialofoursen-suousimpressionsintoaknowledgeofobjects,whichiscalledexperience?Inrespectoftime,therefore,noknowledgeofoursisantecedenttoexperience,butbeginswithit.But,tho
5、ughallourknowledgebeginswithex-perience,itbynomeansfollowsthatallarisesoutofexperience.For,onthecontrary,itisqui-tepossiblethatourempiricalknowledgeisacompoundofthatwhichwereceivethroughimpressions,andthatwhichthefacultyofcog-nitionsuppliesfromitself(sensuousimpres-sions
6、givingmerelytheoccasion),anadditionwhichwecannotdistinguishfromtheoriginalelementgivenbysense,tilllongpracticehasmadeusattentiveto,andskilfulinseparatingit.Itis,therefore,aquestionwhichrequirescloseinvestigation,andnottobeansweredatfirstsight,whetherthereexistsaknowledge
7、altogetherindependentofexperience,andevenofallsensuousimpressions?Knowledgeofthiskindiscalledapriori,incontradistinctiontoempiricalknowledge,whichhasitssourcesaposteriori,thatis,inexperience.Buttheexpression,"apriori,"isnotasyetdefi-niteenoughadequatelytoindicatethewhole
8、meaningofthequestionabovestarted.For,inspeakingofknowledgewhichhasitssourcesinexperience,wearewonttosay