資源描述:
《金融詐騙罪中非法占有目的的認(rèn)定思考》由會(huì)員上傳分享,免費(fèi)在線閱讀,更多相關(guān)內(nèi)容在教育資源-天天文庫(kù)。
1、.金融詐騙罪中“非法占有目的”的認(rèn)定思考摘要改革開(kāi)放以來(lái)隨著我們社會(huì)主義市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的不斷深入,金融領(lǐng)域的犯罪活動(dòng)也隨之增加,尤其是金融詐騙活動(dòng)呈上升態(tài)勢(shì),嚴(yán)重危害了我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)的健康發(fā)展以及國(guó)家和人民的財(cái)產(chǎn)安全。通過(guò)制定法律完善法制建設(shè)打擊各類金融詐騙行為已經(jīng)成為嚴(yán)懲和遏制此類違法犯罪行為的良方,我國(guó)刑法中對(duì)金融詐騙罪的成立以及懲處措施有著明確的規(guī)定,在司法實(shí)踐中起到了理想的作用,但是我們還是看到了法律在某些細(xì)節(jié)要件中的規(guī)定仍然存在著改進(jìn)的地方,本文將以金融詐騙中的主觀要件“非法占有為目的”為切入口,對(duì)當(dāng)前金融詐騙“非法占有目
2、的”認(rèn)定中存在的爭(zhēng)議,實(shí)務(wù)中非法占有目的的認(rèn)定方法以及結(jié)合各類典型案例談一談自己的見(jiàn)解和看法。本文包括引言、正文、結(jié)語(yǔ)三個(gè)部分,正文由三章組成。主要內(nèi)容如下:第一章著重闡述金融詐騙罪中非法占有目的的立法現(xiàn)狀以及存在的學(xué)術(shù)爭(zhēng)議,闡明當(dāng)下的學(xué)術(shù)通說(shuō)并談一談自己的看法。第二章重點(diǎn)闡述實(shí)務(wù)中“非法占有為目的”的認(rèn)定方法。第三章主要通過(guò)結(jié)合各類典型案例,透過(guò)實(shí)際情況,表明自己的觀點(diǎn),并提出幾點(diǎn)看法為立法者建言。[關(guān)鍵詞]金融詐騙罪非法占有目的認(rèn)定-..Thethinkingoftheidentificationfor"thepurpo
3、seofillegalpossession"inTheCrimeofFinancialfraudAbstractWiththedeepeningprogressofreformandopeningupinChina'ssocialistmarketeconomy,thenumberofcriminalactivitiesinthefinancialareahasbeenonarise,amongwhichthefinancialfraudisincreasingseriously.Thesecriminalactivitie
4、shavedonegreatharmtothehealthydevelopmentofChina'seconomyaswellaspropertysecurityofboththecountryandthepeople.Improvingthelegalsystemtoenactlawstocombatalltypesoffinancialfraudhasbecomethebestwaytoputseverelypunishinsuchcriminalsanddeterfurthercriminalacts.Aswecans
5、ee,China'scriminallawhasclaimedaclearstatementonthedefinitionandpunishmentmeasuresonfinancialfraud,andplayedanimportantroleinjudicialpractice,however,theCriminallawinsomedetailsstillneedfurtherimprovement.Therefore,thispaperwillbebuiltfromtheperspectiveofthesubject
6、iveelementofsuchcrime,whichis"thepurposeofillegalpossession",bydiscussingthecontroversiestheauthorizationmethodsinpractice,atthesametimecombiningvarioustypesoftypicalcasestomakeapointofmyown.Thispaperconsistsofthreeparts:anintroduction,abodyandaconclusion,themainco
7、ntentsareasfollows:Thefirstpartfocusesonthestatusoffinancialfraudinthelegislativepurposeofillegalpossessionandthepresentacademicdebatetoclarifythecurrentuniversaldoctrineontheacademicfieldandputforwardthearguments.Thesecondpartdiscussestheidentifyingmethodsof"thepu
8、rposeofillegalpossession"inpractice.Thethirdpartismainlytomakeafewlegislativesuggestionsthroughadeepanalysisoftypicalcaseandtheactualsituation,in