惡意訴訟侵權(quán)責(zé)任的研究

惡意訴訟侵權(quán)責(zé)任的研究

ID:32228783

大?。?.45 MB

頁數(shù):39頁

時間:2019-02-01

惡意訴訟侵權(quán)責(zé)任的研究_第1頁
惡意訴訟侵權(quán)責(zé)任的研究_第2頁
惡意訴訟侵權(quán)責(zé)任的研究_第3頁
惡意訴訟侵權(quán)責(zé)任的研究_第4頁
惡意訴訟侵權(quán)責(zé)任的研究_第5頁
資源描述:

《惡意訴訟侵權(quán)責(zé)任的研究》由會員上傳分享,免費(fèi)在線閱讀,更多相關(guān)內(nèi)容在學(xué)術(shù)論文-天天文庫。

1、堊圣垂絲墼堡壘霎!!至窒AbstractThemaliciousprosecutionisonlyactionableintortiftheproceedingswereinitiatedbothmaliciouslyandwithoutreasonableandprobablecauseandtheywerethemaliciousinstitutionoflegalproceedingsagainstapersonWhichisdifferentwithsomesimilarconceptsuchasabuseofproceduralrights

2、.Weshouldborrowthestatesofcommonlawtoclassifythemaliciousprosecution.Ithasthreeexhibitionswhichincludesmaliciousprosecution,maliciousabuseofcivilproceedingsandabuseofprocess.Themaliciousprosecutionisanessentiallygeneralviolation,theelementoftheirtortliabilityare:theproceedingsw

3、ereinitiatedbothmaliciouslyandwithoutreasonableandprobablecause,theproceedingsQrnegativeobligationnottocarryoutactionsthatviolatethelaw,Causesdamagetoothers.Establishedcausalrelationshipbetweentheoffenseanddamageresults.Maliciousprosecutionintortliabilityofthespecialonitsown.Fi

4、rst,themainresponsibility,forthemaliciousactsshouldlitigants,attorneysfortheactorsespeciallythelawyers,Ithinkthatshouldbejointlyandseverallyliable,butnottoobroadscaleInviewofthecaseofdamagecausedbyjudicialofficerswhocancoverpositionsinfringement,shouldnotbeincludedinthistypeofi

5、nfringement;Secondly,thescopeofdamages,includinglegalfeesofpropertydamageandmentaldamages.Ourcurrentlawonlyhassomelawprinciplesaboutmaliciousprosecutionandhasnotspecificauthorityinsubstantivelaw.Butaccordingtojudicialpracticetherulesonprinciplearedifferentinapplicationonmalicio

6、usprosecutiondirectlywhichisbadforprotectingthepeople’Sfightproperlyandlargely.TheauthoranalyzestherulesaboutmaliciousprosecutioninthetwocivillawcodedriRs,andweshouldestablishspecificsysteminthefuturecivillawcodeinordertoforbidmaliciousprosecution.Soaccordingtotheforeignexperie

7、nceandourpractice,theauthordesignsaspecificclauseinordertosolvethisproblem.Legislativedefinitionofmaliciouscontent,themainclearlymaliciouslitigation,thethreetortlitigationreflectsmaliciousformtortdamagesformaliciousprosecutiontoclarifythescopeofthistopic.Keywords:maliciousprose

8、cution;abuseoftherighttoappeal;tortliability;damageⅢ湖南

當(dāng)前文檔最多預(yù)覽五頁,下載文檔查看全文

此文檔下載收益歸作者所有

當(dāng)前文檔最多預(yù)覽五頁,下載文檔查看全文
溫馨提示:
1. 部分包含數(shù)學(xué)公式或PPT動畫的文件,查看預(yù)覽時可能會顯示錯亂或異常,文件下載后無此問題,請放心下載。
2. 本文檔由用戶上傳,版權(quán)歸屬用戶,天天文庫負(fù)責(zé)整理代發(fā)布。如果您對本文檔版權(quán)有爭議請及時聯(lián)系客服。
3. 下載前請仔細(xì)閱讀文檔內(nèi)容,確認(rèn)文檔內(nèi)容符合您的需求后進(jìn)行下載,若出現(xiàn)內(nèi)容與標(biāo)題不符可向本站投訴處理。
4. 下載文檔時可能由于網(wǎng)絡(luò)波動等原因無法下載或下載錯誤,付費(fèi)完成后未能成功下載的用戶請聯(lián)系客服處理。