資源描述:
《SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH An Evaluator’s Guide to the IRB》由會員上傳分享,免費在線閱讀,更多相關內(nèi)容在行業(yè)資料-天天文庫。
1、EvaluationReviewhttp://erx.sagepub.comRisksandWrongsinSocialScienceResearch:AnEvaluator'sGuidetotheIRBJ.MichaelOakesEvalRev2002;26;443Theonlineversionofthisarticlecanbefoundat:http://erx.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/26/5/443Publishedby:http://www.sagepublications.comAdditionalservice
2、sandinformationforEvaluationReviewcanbefoundat:EmailAlerts:http://erx.sagepub.com/cgi/alertsSubscriptions:http://erx.sagepub.com/subscriptionsReprints:http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.navPermissions:http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.navDownloadedfromhttp://erx.sagepub.com
3、atPENNSYLVANIASTATEUNIVonApril11,2008?2002SAGEPublications.Allrightsreserved.Notforcommercialuseorunauthorizeddistribution.10.1177/019384102236520EVALUATIONREVIEW/OCTOBER2002Oakes/EVALUATOR’SGUIDETOTHEIRBHavinganInstitutionalReviewBoard(IRB)reviewandmonitortheuseofhumansubjectsisnowfunda
4、mentaltoethicalresearch.Yetsocialscientistsappearincreasinglyfrustratedwiththeprocess.ThisarticleaimstoassistevaluatorsstrugglingtounderstandandworkwithIRBs.TheauthortheorizeswhyIRBsfrustrateandinsiststhereisonlyoneremedy:WemustacceptthelegitimacyofIRBreviewand(a)learnmoreaboutIRBregulat
5、ions,imperatives,andthenewpressuresonthem;and(b)educateIRBsaboutsocialscientificmethodologiesandempiricallydemonstrablerisks.Aresearchagendaandtipsareoffered.RISKSANDWRONGSINSOCIALSCIENCERESEARCHAnEvaluator’sGuidetotheIRBJ.MICHAELOAKESUniversityofMinnesotaAnInstitutionalReviewBoard(IRB)i
6、sacommitteeoffiveormorediverseindividualswhoreviewresearchprotocolsandmonitorongoingstud-iestoensuretheprotectionofhumanresearchsubjects.IRBsaretypicallylocalandthereforepresumedtounderstandtheconcernsofthecommunitywhereresearchisconducted.Althoughalmostalwayspartofaresearchorga-nization
7、,tobelegitimateanIRBmustoperateindependentlyofitsauthoritystructure.AlthoughfederalregulationsmustbeadheredtoandIRBshavetheauthoritytodisapproveresearch,modernIRBsaimtoworkwith,educate,andlearnfromresearchersonhowbesttoprotecthumanresearchsubjects.AUTHOR’SNOTE:Thisarticle