資源描述：
《產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作技術(shù)創(chuàng)新模式分析》由會(huì)員上傳分享，免費(fèi)在線閱讀，更多相關(guān)內(nèi)容在行業(yè)資料-天天文庫。
1、萬方數(shù)據(jù)中國軟科學(xué)2009年第8期產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作技術(shù)創(chuàng)新模式分析仲偉俊，梅姝娥，謝園園(東南大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)管理學(xué)院，江蘇南京210096)摘要：本文從企業(yè)視角對我國產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作及其技術(shù)創(chuàng)新模式進(jìn)行了分析。首先研究了產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作以及產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作技術(shù)創(chuàng)新模式的分類；然后利用江蘇229家創(chuàng)新型企業(yè)的問卷調(diào)查數(shù)據(jù)對產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作及其技術(shù)創(chuàng)新模式進(jìn)行了實(shí)證分析，得出了產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作內(nèi)容涉及技術(shù)創(chuàng)新、人才培養(yǎng)、實(shí)驗(yàn)設(shè)備和儀器利用、信息獲取等多個(gè)方面，在產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作技術(shù)創(chuàng)新中聯(lián)合開發(fā)處于絕對主導(dǎo)地位、委托開發(fā)和咨詢也發(fā)揮重要作用、但成果轉(zhuǎn)化和創(chuàng)新創(chuàng)業(yè)處于比較次要位置等基本結(jié)論；接
2、著通過對調(diào)查結(jié)果的深入剖析，形成了不能用科技成果轉(zhuǎn)化率衡量產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作水平、產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作應(yīng)由基于成果的合作向注重能力的合作轉(zhuǎn)變、加快提升產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作技術(shù)創(chuàng)新水平的關(guān)鍵是要增強(qiáng)企業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新的積極性和能力等基本觀點(diǎn)。關(guān)鍵詞：產(chǎn)學(xué)研合作；技術(shù)創(chuàng)新模式；分析中圖分類號(hào)：F273．1文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識(shí)碼：A文章編號(hào)：1002—9753(2009)08—0174—08AnalysisofTechnologicalInnovationModesfortheIndustry—-University——InstituteCooperationZHONGWei—jan，MEI
3、Shu—e，XIEYuan—yuan(SchoolofEconomicsandManagement，SoutheastUniversity，Nanjing210096，China)Abstract：Fromtheviewofenterprises，thispapermakesananalysisofChineseindustry—university—institutecoopera—tionanditstechnologicalinnovationmodes．Firstly，thetaxonomyoftheindustry—univers
4、ity—institutecooperationanditstechnologicalinnovationmodesisdiscussed．Then，accordingtotheempiricalanalysesbasedonthedatacollectedfromthequestionnairesof229innovationalenterprisesinJiangsu，somebasicconclusionsareobtained：(1)thecon-tentsoftheindustry—university—institutecoop
5、erationrefertoseveralaspectssuchastechnologicalinnovation，person—neltraining。usageofexperimentalequipmentandinformationacquisition；(2)amongallthetechnologicalinnovationmodesintheindustry—university—institutecooperation，jointandcooperationR&Disinallabsolutelydominantposi—ti
6、on，commissionedR&Dandconsultationalsoplayanimportantrole，whiletransformofthescienceresearchandtech-nologydevelopmentachievementsandflewventuresareinasecondaryposition．Finally，throughthefuaheranalysesofthesurveyresults．someessentialviewsareformed：(1)thelevelofindustry—unive
7、rsity—institutecooperationCannotbeevaluatedaccordingtothetransformrateofthescienceresearchandtechnologydevelopmentachievements；(2)theindustry—university—institutecooperationshouldbetransformedfromachievements—basedtoability—emphasized：(3)thekeytospeedupupgradingthelevelofi
8、ndustry—university—institutecooperationtechnologicalinnovationistoenhancetheenthusiasmand
