資源描述:
《人性化護(hù)理干預(yù)對慢性心力衰竭患者負(fù)性心理及心功能的影響》由會員上傳分享,免費在線閱讀,更多相關(guān)內(nèi)容在學(xué)術(shù)論文-天天文庫。
1、人性化護(hù)理干預(yù)對慢性心力衰竭患者負(fù)性心理及心功能的影響[摘要]H的探?人性化護(hù)理干預(yù)對慢性心力衰竭患者負(fù)性心理及心功能的影響。方法選擇我院于2015年6月?2016年6月收治的慢性心力衰竭60例,按照隨機(jī)數(shù)字表法分為干預(yù)組與對照組,每組30例。對照組患者給予常規(guī)對癥護(hù)理,干預(yù)組在對照組基礎(chǔ)上采取人性化護(hù)理干預(yù),對兩組患者的焦慮、抑郁的負(fù)性心理進(jìn)行評價,并比較兩組患者干預(yù)前后的LVEF水平,以對患者的心功能改善情況進(jìn)行評價。結(jié)果兩組患者干預(yù)前的SAS、SDS評分比較無統(tǒng)計學(xué)差異(P>0.05);干預(yù)后,兩組患者的SAS、SDS評分分別較干預(yù)前顯著降低,均有統(tǒng)計學(xué)差異(P〈0.05);且干預(yù)組干預(yù)
2、后的SAS、SDS評分較對照組降低更顯著,組間比較均有統(tǒng)計學(xué)差異(P〈0.05)。兩組患者干預(yù)前LVEF比較無統(tǒng)計學(xué)差異(P〉0.05);兩組干預(yù)后LVEF顯著增加,與干預(yù)前比較均有統(tǒng)計學(xué)差異(P〈0.05);干預(yù)組的LVEF水平顯著高于對照組,組間比較有統(tǒng)計學(xué)差異(P〈0.05)。結(jié)論對慢性心力衰竭患者在積極治療的同時實施人性化護(hù)理干預(yù)措施,有利于緩解患者的焦慮、抑郁等負(fù)性心理,改善心功能,從而改善患者的預(yù)后。本文采集自網(wǎng)絡(luò),本站發(fā)布的論文均是優(yōu)質(zhì)論文,供學(xué)習(xí)和研究使用,文中立場與本網(wǎng)站無關(guān),版權(quán)和著作權(quán)歸原作者所有,如有不愿意被轉(zhuǎn)載的情況,請通知我們刪除己轉(zhuǎn)載的信息,如果需要分享,請保留本
3、段說明。[關(guān)鍵詞]慢性心力衰竭;人性化護(hù)理;負(fù)性心理;心功能[中圖分類號]R47[文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識碼]B[文章編號]1673-9701(2017)13-0154-03[Abstract]ObjectiveToinvestigatetheeffectofhumanisticnursinginterventiononthenegativepsychologyandcardiacfunctionofpatientswithchronicheartfailure.Methods60casesofchronicheartfailureinourhospitalfromJune2015toJune2016were
4、randomlydividedintointerventiongroupandcontrolgroup,eachgroupof30cases.Thecontrolgroupwasgivenroutinenursing,theinterventiongroupwasgiventhehumanizednursinginterventiononthebasisofthecontrolgroup,thenegativepsychologyofthetwogroupsofpatientswithanxietyanddepressionwereevaluatedandcomparedbeforeandaf
5、tertheintervention,theLVEFlevelsofcardiacfunctioninpatientschronicheartfailurewereevaluated.ResultsTherewerenosignificantdifferencesinSASandSDSscoresbetweenthetwogroupsbeforeintervention(P>0.05);Afterintervention,theSASandSDSscoresintwogroupsofpatientsweresignificantlylowerthanthosebeforeinterventio
6、n,withstatisticallysignificantdifference(P<0.05);andtheSASandSDSscoresintheinterventiongroupafterinterventionwerelowermoresignificantlythanthecontrolgroup,withstatisticallysignificantdifference(P〈0.05).Beforeintervention,theLVEFlevelshadnosignificantdifferencebetweentwogroups(P>0.05);afterinterventi
7、on,theLVEFlevelsoftwogroupsincreasedsignificantlythanbeforeintervention,withstatisticallysignificantdifference(P〈0.05);thelevelofLVEFintheinterventiongroupwassignificantlyhigherthanthecontrolgroup,the